top of page
Search

ONE NATION UNDER GOD: A Message to Every Patriot

Introduction: The Forgotten Regiment of Freedom

In every age where tyranny has risen and liberty has faltered, God has raised up men of courage, clarity, and conviction to stand in the gap. In the era of America’s founding, that stand was taken not merely by statesmen or soldiers, but by shepherds of souls, preachers whose pulpits became platforms for revolution. These men, known to history as the Black Robe Regiment, were the moral and spiritual generals of the American cause, so named by the British in disdain and fear. They did not lead battalions with sabers, but they led congregations with scripture. Their robes were black, but their vision was ablaze with the light of liberty. They were not traitors to a king; they were servants of a higher King.


The Black Robe Regiment
The Black Robe Regiment

 

The Revolution, as John Adams later observed, had already taken place in the hearts and minds of the people before a single shot was fired. That transformation occurred in large part within the walls of the colonial church. It was in the preaching of men like Jonathan Mayhew, John Witherspoon, Samuel Cooper, and Peter Muhlenberg that the ideological groundwork for the break from Britain was laid. These sermons were not mere theological discourses; they were political theology, deeply rooted in Scripture, articulating the covenantal responsibilities between ruler and ruled. The biblical narrative, particularly the Exodus, the kings of Israel, and the apostolic defiance of tyrants in Acts, became the lens through which American colonists interpreted their own situation.

 

What made these ministers dangerous to the British Crown was not only their rhetoric, but their righteousness. They preached that rights were not the grant of government, but the gift of God. They insisted that submission to government was conditional upon that government’s submission to divine justice. In their reading of Romans 13, obedience was owed not to all rulers, but only to those who fulfilled their God-ordained role as servants for good. When that role was perverted, when magistrates punished the righteous and rewarded the wicked, resistance became not rebellion, but fidelity to a higher law. As Samuel West declared in his famed 1776 sermon, “He who would not resist the oppressor would dishonor God.”

 

The Black Robe Regiment thus stands not as a relic of history, but as a prophetic pattern. Their legacy is a reminder that the pulpit must never retreat from the public square; that pastors are not only called to comfort the afflicted, but also to confront the unjust. They teach us that liberty is born in the soul before it is secured by the sword, and that no nation can remain free whose churches are silent in the face of sin, statism, and moral decay.

 

This essay will explore, in detail, the historical emergence, theological foundation, civic influence, and modern relevance of the Black Robe Regiment. It will demonstrate how their work laid the spiritual and philosophical foundation for American independence, how their example should inform faithful Christian witness today, and why reclaiming their courage may be our only hope for enduring freedom. In an age where truth is traded for tolerance and conscience is sacrificed at the altar of convenience, we must once more hear the pulpit thunder.

 

Let us now journey into their world, where faith was not private, but public; where church bells summoned patriots; and where the Gospel of Christ and the cause of liberty marched arm in arm.

 

I. The Origins of the Black Robe Regiment

To understand the Black Robe Regiment is to grasp the soul of the American Revolution. Long before muskets were raised at Lexington and Concord, the revolution had been waged in the conscience of the colonists, in the churches, where liberty was preached as a divine inheritance and tyranny was denounced as sin against heaven. It is no exaggeration to say that the American Revolution began in the pulpit.

 

The term “Black Robe Regiment” was coined by British officers who, looking across the Atlantic, saw that the greatest threat to royal authority was not found in rebel militias, but in the uncompromising sermons of colonial ministers. Dressed in black Geneva gowns, symbols of their clerical office, these pastors stood as sentinels of righteousness, declaring from Scripture the limits of human government and the supremacy of divine authority. They were largely drawn from Congregationalist, Presbyterian, Baptist, and Reformed Anglican traditions, denominations forged in the fires of Reformation and persecution, each carrying within its theological DNA a distrust of unchecked power and a commitment to sola Scriptura.

 

The theological and cultural soil from which the Black Robe Regiment arose was deeply shaped by two key influences: the Protestant Reformation and the First Great Awakening. The Reformers had taught that all authority was derived from God, and that rulers were not above the law but accountable to it. The concept of Lex Rex, “the law is king”, championed by Samuel Rutherford in 1644, directly challenged the divine right of kings and shaped the thinking of American pastors a century later. ¹

 

By the mid-18th century, the First Great Awakening had swept through the colonies, reinvigorating spiritual life and instilling a profound sense of moral responsibility. Preachers such as George Whitefield and Jonathan Edwards called colonists to repentance and righteousness, laying a spiritual foundation that would ultimately buttress political liberty. This awakening was not just a revival of emotion, it was a revival of theology, reinforcing the idea that liberty of conscience before God must be defended in the civil realm.

 

One cannot understand the emergence of the Black Robe Regiment without also understanding the covenantal worldview of early Americans. They believed their political community was under covenant with God, just as ancient Israel had been. As the Puritans declared in the Massachusetts Body of Liberties (1641), their laws were derived not from the will of men, but from the justice of Scripture. This covenantal thinking produced a people deeply attuned to the responsibilities of both rulers and citizens. When King George III and Parliament violated those responsibilities, through taxation without representation, military occupation, and suppression of religious freedom, colonial pastors interpreted such actions as not only political offenses, but breaches of covenant with God.

 

Perhaps no better example exists of this spirit than Jonathan Mayhew, a Congregationalist minister from Boston. In 1750, twenty-six years before the Declaration of Independence, he preached a sermon entitled “A Discourse Concerning Unlimited Submission and Non-Resistance to the Higher Powers.” In it, Mayhew declared that Romans 13 was not a command for slavish obedience, but an affirmation that civil rulers are accountable to God’s justice. He stated: “It is blasphemy to call tyrants and oppressors God’s ministers. They are more properly the messengers of Satan to buffet us.” ²

 

This sermon reverberated throughout New England. It was printed, reprinted, and read aloud in taverns and town halls. John Adams later said that the real Revolution began with Mayhew’s sermon. It had planted the seed that civil government must conform to moral government, and that when it failed to do so, the people not only had the right, but the duty, to resist.

 

Thus, the Black Robe Regiment did not arise as a sudden reaction to British tyranny. They were the culmination of more than a century of theological formation, moral courage, and biblical literacy. They did not preach rebellion, they preached responsibility. They did not preach anarchy, they preached alignment with God’s law above all human decrees. They believed what Scripture declares in Acts 5:29:

 

“We ought to obey God rather than men.” And obey they did. With open Bibles and bold hearts, they led their congregations not into war for conquest, but into a struggle for the preservation of conscience, covenant, and Christ-exalting liberty.

 

Footnotes:

1. Samuel Rutherford, Lex, Rex: The Law and the Prince (1644).

2. Jonathan Mayhew, A Discourse Concerning Unlimited Submission and Non-Resistance to the Higher Powers, 1750. Reprinted in Ellis Sandoz, Political Sermons of the American Founding Era: 1730–1805, Vol. 1 (Liberty Fund, 1998).

 

II. Theological Foundations for Resistance

To understand why the clergy of the American colonies stood so firmly against the British Crown, one must first understand the theological worldview that animated their resistance. Their stand was not born from a love of conflict, but from a deep and abiding commitment to biblical authority, covenant theology, and natural law. In short, they believed that tyranny was sin, and resistance to tyranny was obedience to God.

 

Romans 13 in Historical Context. One of the most hotly debated passages of Scripture in the Revolutionary era was Romans 13:1–4, where the Apostle Paul writes: “Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers. For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God.” (KJV)

 

At first glance, this passage might seem to demand unconditional obedience to civil government. But for the pastors of the Black Robe Regiment, many of whom were deeply trained in biblical languages and exegesis, this was not the conclusion. They asked a crucial question: What happens when the “higher power” becomes a law unto itself, defying the justice and mercy of God?

 

They noted that the same passage in Romans 13 describes the ruler as “a minister of God to thee for good.” That is, the legitimacy of government rests in its God-ordained purpose: to reward good and punish evil. When a government reverses that order, when it punishes righteousness and protects wickedness, it ceases to be God’s servant and becomes an instrument of oppression. At that point, pastors like Samuel West, Elisha Williams, and John Witherspoon argued, resistance becomes not only justified but required. “Civil rulers are only God's ministers when they act in accordance with the purposes of their office.” Samuel West, 1776 ³

 

Acts 5:29 and the Limits of Obedience. The preachers of the revolution regularly paired Romans 13 with Acts 5:29: “We ought to obey God rather than men.” This verse became a kind of theological rallying cry. It reminded colonists that while obedience to authority was good and right, it was always subordinate to obedience to God’s higher law.

 

Just as Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego refused to bow to Nebuchadnezzar’s golden image (Daniel 3), and just as Peter and the apostles continued to preach Christ despite being ordered to stop (Acts 4–5), so too must faithful men and women stand when civil authorities command what God forbids or forbid what God commands.

 

The Law Above the King. Many colonial pastors were trained in both theology and law, steeped in the works of John Locke, Samuel Rutherford, and Algernon Sidney. They saw a clear continuity between natural law, biblical morality, and the rights of man. As Locke wrote in his Second Treatise of Government (1689): “The end of law is not to abolish or restrain, but to preserve and enlarge freedom.” ⁴

 

This Lockean understanding of natural rights was seen not as secular but as derivative of the biblical doctrine of imago Dei, that all men are made in the image of God and thus possess inherent dignity, conscience, and liberty. To violate those rights was not simply political error; it was theological transgression.

 

Thus, when Parliament imposed laws such as the Stamp Act, Townshend Acts, and ultimately the Coercive Acts, ministers preached not about politics in the abstract, but about a covenant being broken, a justice being perverted, and a God whose law was being mocked by the pretensions of earthly kings.

 

Sermons That Shaped a Nation. These theological convictions were not kept in private journals, they were thundered from pulpits every Sunday. Preachers drew direct connections between biblical Israel and the American colonies. Sermons compared King George III to Pharaoh, and the colonies to the Israelites seeking deliverance. The story of Exodus became America’s spiritual narrative.

 

Rev. Jacob Duché, chaplain of the Continental Congress, opened the first session in 1774 by reading Psalm 35, a prayer for deliverance from enemies, and the entire assembly wept.

 

Rev. Stephen Johnson of Lyme, Connecticut, published sermons calling Britain “a mother turned tyrant,” while

 

Rev. Charles Chauncy in Boston declared that it was “treason against Heaven to submit to earthly tyranny.”

 

Rev. John Witherspoon delivered his 1776 sermon, “The Dominion of Providence over the Passions of Men,” in which he preached: “There is not a single instance in history in which civil liberty was lost, and religious liberty preserved.” ⁵

 

These men did not preach insurrection. They preached interposition, the biblical and historical principle that when a higher authority violates God’s law, a lower authority has both the right and the duty to stand in the gap to protect the people.

 

Resistance as Worship. Most strikingly, the theology of the Black Robe Regiment did not separate resistance from worship. They taught that standing for liberty was not merely a political act, but a spiritual one. It was a form of worship to honor the God who made man free. Every act of resistance to tyranny was seen as an act of fidelity to Christ, the true King. They believed that if the church remained silent while conscience was crushed, it would be complicit in evil.

 

It was not their theology that made them revolutionaries; it was their reverence for God that made them resolute. They believed that one day they would give account, not to George III or even to posterity, but to the Judge of all the earth. And they wished to be found faithful.

 

Footnotes:

3. Samuel West, Election Sermon, Massachusetts Council, 1776.

4. John Locke, Second Treatise of Government, 1689.

5. John Witherspoon, The Dominion of Providence over the Passions of Men, 1776, in Ellis Sandoz, ed., Political Sermons of the American Founding Era.

 

III. Pulpits of Revolution: Sermons That Stirred a Nation

When the British Parliament passed laws to tax and control the American colonies, the most resounding rebuttal did not first come from politicians or pamphleteers, it came from the pulpit. In colonial America, the sermon was the single most influential cultural event of the week. Churches were not merely spiritual centers; they were the heart of political discourse, civic instruction, and public morality. It is in this context that we must understand the pulpit as a revolutionary institution.

 

The Sunday Sermon as Political Weapon. Colonial pastors stood behind wooden pulpits in town churches across New England, New York, Virginia, and the Carolinas and delivered “election sermons,” “artillery sermons,” “fast-day sermons,” and “thanksgiving sermons” that directly addressed contemporary political events. These sermons were published in newspapers and pamphlets, copied by hand, and spread throughout the colonies like wildfire. Ministers were the most widely read authors of their day, not in spite of their theology, but because of it.

 

The clergy of the Black Robe Regiment did not shy away from naming injustices. They exposed the abuses of Parliament, warned of the dangers of arbitrary rule, and rallied their listeners with visions of moral government under God. But their authority did not come from eloquence alone, it came from their exegesis of Scripture and their prophetic courage to declare, “Thus saith the Lord.”

 

Consider Jonathan Mayhew’s fiery sermons in Boston, which prepared the ground for revolution a generation before it began. Or Rev. Samuel Cooper, whose congregation included both John Hancock and Samuel Adams, and whose influence over the patriot cause was so great that British officials referred to him as “the high priest of sedition.”

 

The Art of the Revolutionary Sermon. The structure of the revolutionary sermon was deliberate and forceful. It typically followed a format rooted in Puritan homiletics (the art and science of the delivery of sermons):

 

Scriptural Exposition: The preacher would begin with a biblical text (often Exodus, Romans 13, or the books of the Kings) and expound upon it.

 

Moral Application: The message was applied to the situation of the day, drawing parallels between Israel and the colonies, Saul and George III, Moses and the Continental Congress.

 

Civic Exhortation: The sermon would conclude with a call to action: repentance, civic engagement, resistance, or even enlistment.

 

These were not lectures, they were moral thunderbolts, and congregants responded. As one British observer remarked, “If you want to understand why America is in rebellion, go and listen to their sermons.”

 

Peter Muhlenberg: The Pulpit Turns to the Battlefield. Perhaps no episode better captures the fusion of faith and patriotism than the moment Rev. Peter Muhlenberg ascended his pulpit in Woodstock, Virginia, in 1776. Preaching from Ecclesiastes 3:1, he declared: “To everything there is a season, and a time for every purpose under heaven... a time to preach and a time to fight. And now is the time to fight.”

 

With that, he removed his clerical robe to reveal the uniform of a Continental Army colonel, then walked down the aisle and called on the men of his congregation to join him in forming the 8th Virginia Regiment. Nearly 300 men rose to their feet. That church service became a military recruitment rally. That pulpit became a launchpad for battle. That sermon became an enlistment oath.

 

The Influence of Sermons on the Founders. The Founders themselves credited these sermons as instrumental in shaping the intellectual and moral framework of the Revolution. John Adams wrote to a friend:

 

“The pulpits have thundered... It is the duty of the clergy to accommodate their discourses to the times, to preach against such sins as are most prevalent and recommend such virtues as are most wanted.” ⁶

 

These sermons provided not only emotional fuel but intellectual grounding. They connected the cause of independence with the providence of God, linking natural rights to biblical mandates. In an age when church and state were not isolated but interwoven in the public mind, these messages had profound impact.

 

Sermons did not just support the Revolution, they legitimized it. They consecrated it. They armed the conscience of a people to do what conscience alone could not bear: to rise up against established authority in the name of righteousness.

 

Modern Implications: Who Preaches Now? In our own day, the sermon has been domesticated. Often reduced to a motivational speech or therapeutic reflection, it rarely addresses the moral crises of the age; abortion, statism, corruption, sexual perversion, attacks on conscience and religious liberty. Yet the pulpit remains powerful, if only it would awaken.

 

If the Black Robe Regiment were among us today, what would they say? Would they preach a soft gospel in the face of hard tyranny? Would they stay silent while Caesar redefines life, marriage, and morality?

 

Or would they, like their forebears, stand again in pulpits and declare, “Thus saith the Lord,” with trembling voice and undaunted soul?

 

Would they remind us, as Noah Webster did, that “the moral principles and precepts found in the Scriptures ought to form the basis of all our civil constitutions and laws”?

Would they reclaim the sermon not as a Sunday performance, but as a summons to spiritual and civic repentance?

Would they awaken the church to see that the preservation of liberty depends not first on ballots, but on Bibles, in the hands of bold, believing, biblically-anchored pastors?

 

Footnotes:

6. John Adams, letter to Zabdiel Adams, June 21, 1776. In Charles Francis Adams, ed., The Works of John Adams, Vol. 9.

 

IV. Clergy in Combat and Congress: Faithful in the Field and the Forum

While the pulpits of the American colonies thundered with the sounds of spiritual and civic conviction, many of the men who preached those sermons also took up arms, not in defiance of their calling, but in fulfillment of it. To them, defending liberty was not a contradiction of the Gospel; it was a demonstration of love for neighbor, a defense of conscience, and an act of covenant faithfulness. They did not lay aside their pastoral identity to become soldiers or statesmen; they embodied the belief that to serve both God and country was a holy vocation.

 

The Shepherd Who Led a Regiment. The most famous example, of course, is Rev. Peter Muhlenberg. As recounted in the previous section, his bold sermon from Ecclesiastes 3, followed by the revelation of his Continental Army uniform, was not merely symbolic. He went on to command the 8th Virginia Regiment, eventually rising to the rank of brigadier general. He fought at Brandywine, Germantown, Monmouth, and Yorktown, where he was present for Cornwallis’ surrender.

 

But what made Muhlenberg remarkable was not just his military valor, it was that he never ceased to be a pastor. He prayed with his men, preached when possible, and saw his service not as a departure from ministry but as an extension of it. He embodied the pastoral warrior, committed to the “just war” tradition rooted in Christian ethics and the defense of innocent life.

 

The Pulpit and the Powder Horn. Muhlenberg was not alone. Rev. James Caldwell of New Jersey, a fiery Presbyterian, was nicknamed “The Fighting Chaplain.” During the Battle of Springfield (1780), Caldwell ran into a church and grabbed stacks of Isaac Watts’ hymnals to serve as wadding for soldiers’ rifles, shouting, “Give ’em Watts, boys!” His wife was later killed by a British sniper, and Caldwell himself was assassinated, yet his courage galvanized patriot sentiment throughout the region.

 

Other pastors organized militias from their congregations, served as chaplains, or provided crucial supplies. Rev. Naphtali Daggett, president of Yale, took up arms to defend New Haven from British troops. Though captured and beaten, he refused to recant his support for liberty. Rev. John Cleveland, a Congregationalist in Massachusetts, wrote patriotic hymns and directly aided George Washington in recruitment efforts.

 

Even those who remained in their pulpits often transformed their churches into supply depots, field hospitals, and meeting houses for revolutionary planning. In many cases, churches became the physical and spiritual headquarters of the Revolution.

 

From Pews to Policy: Clergy in the Continental Congress. Beyond the battlefield, several prominent clergymen served in civil leadership roles. Rev. John Witherspoon, a Scottish Presbyterian and president of Princeton University, was not only a signer of the Declaration of Independence but one of its chief defenders.

 

In his influential sermon “The Dominion of Providence over the Passions of Men,” preached in May 1776, Witherspoon declared: “God grant that in America true religion and civil liberty may be inseparable.”

 

Witherspoon trained over 300 students who went on to serve in Congress, governorships, and judicial positions. Among his most notable pupils was James Madison, who would become the chief architect of the Constitution. Thus, the impact of the pulpit extended not only to the common man in the pews, but to the very framers of American governance.

 

The Theology Behind Their Actions. These actions were not contradictions of Christ’s command to love one’s enemies; they were applications of biblical justice. The clergy embraced the “lesser magistrate” doctrine articulated by John Calvin and Rutherford, which held that when higher civil authorities become lawless, it is the duty of lower magistrates, and the people, to interpose.

 

Their service was undergirded by a robust doctrine of vocation. They believed that God called men to diverse roles, not only to preach, but to govern, to fight, to legislate, and to build a just society. In their view, “ministry” was not confined to the sanctuary, it extended to the courtroom, the council chamber, and even the battlefield, where truth must be upheld.

 

They were not political partisans. They were covenantal guardians, driven by a theology that saw the church as the conscience of the nation, and liberty as a stewardship to be defended with both prayer and perseverance.

 

Legacy of the Minister-Statesman. Today, we often compartmentalize public and spiritual life, imagining that pastors have no place in politics or that faith must remain private. But the example of these colonial ministers compels us to reconsider. Their theology did not isolate them from the real struggles of their nation, it propelled them into the midst of those struggles with integrity and hope.

 

They understood what many have forgotten: that freedom is fragile, and that spiritual passivity guarantees political slavery.

 

Their legacy is not that they fought for America, it is that they fought for the soul of man, the liberty of conscience, and the glory of God in every sphere of life. 

 

V. Moral Guardians of the Republic: The Church as Conscience of the Nation

As the smoke of war cleared and the ink of the Constitution dried, the American Republic stood as a political miracle, fragile, young, and in desperate need of moral guidance. In that post-revolutionary moment, the clergy who had stirred the conscience of the colonies were not finished with their work. Their mission was not merely to win independence, but to establish a virtuous people who could sustain it.

 

The Founding Fathers, whether personally devout or philosophically religious, understood one truth above all: liberty cannot long survive without morality, and morality cannot long endure without religion. They saw the pulpit as a central pillar in the architecture of the American experiment.


Washington’s Warning. In his Farewell Address (1796), George Washington, the general turned president, issued what may be the most overlooked warning in American political history: “Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity, religion and morality are indispensable supports.” ⁷

 

Washington was no theocrat, but neither was he a secularist. He knew from experience that men who fought for liberty without virtue would soon destroy the very thing they claimed to cherish. He had watched armies held together not merely by command but by chaplains, prayers, and appeals to divine justice.

 

When Washington referred to “religion,” he did not mean vague spiritual sentiments. He meant the religion of the churches, the biblical worldview preached from the pulpits that had inspired a people to rise up against tyranny, care for the widow and orphan, and build a just and ordered society.

 

The Post-War Work of the Pulpit. In the years following the Revolution, pastors returned to their congregations and took up a new task: forming the moral and civic culture of the Republic. Churches became places where literacy was taught, not only so children could read the Bible, but so they could study law, history, and governance. Sermons warned against corruption, celebrated public virtue, and reinforced the idea that self-government required self-control.

 

In these years, sermons often addressed topics such as: The danger of national pride, The moral obligations of citizenship, The evils of slavery and economic injustice, The sanctity of the family, The institution of marriage, and the necessity of Sabbath observance for public order.

 

Ministers saw the health of the Republic as inseparable from the health of the church. They embraced their role as watchmen on the walls, echoing Ezekiel 33, where the prophet is told that if the watchman fails to warn the people of danger, their blood will be upon his hands.


The Republic Needs Religion. The link between virtue and liberty became a foundational theme in American discourse. John Adams, in a letter to the Massachusetts militia, echoed Washington: “Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.” ⁸


Why? Because liberty, by its very nature, requires restraint, not external restraint imposed by tyranny, but internal restraint formed by character. The pastors of the Black Robe tradition understood that without this restraint, freedom would devolve into license, and license into chaos.

 

Their role, then, was not simply to rail against vice but to cultivate a culture of righteousness, a citizenry capable of governing itself under God. The church, in this model, served as the conscience of the nation, reminding rulers of their duties, and rebuking the people when they forgot theirs.


Failures and Faithfulness. It must be acknowledged, too, that not all clergy rose to this high calling. Some bowed to political expediency. Others remained silent on the great moral issues of their day, most tragically, on the issue of slavery. Yet among the faithful were those who stood tall and spoke clearly, laying the early foundations for abolition, temperance, women’s education, and prison reform.

 

These ministers believed the church was not the servant of the state, nor its enemy, but its moral compass, a distinct, prophetic voice speaking into the halls of power and the homes of citizens alike.

 

A Legacy Lost and Found Again. In the 20th and 21st centuries, much of this vision has faded. The Johnson Amendment of 1954 chilled political speech from the pulpit. The encroachment of statist ideologies and the rise of postmodern relativism have silenced many pastors or led them to believe that “separation of church and state” means separation of truth from politics, Scripture from society, or Christ from culture.

 

But the Constitution was never meant to silence the church. The First Amendment guarantees that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.” The Black Robe Regiment understood this not as a wall to keep the church out, but a protection to keep the state from ruling the conscience of believers.

 

We must reclaim this legacy. If the church does not once again become the moral guardian of the Republic, then that Republic will not stand. Laws may restrain the hand, but only the Gospel restrains the heart.

 

Footnotes:

7. George Washington, Farewell Address, 1796.

8. John Adams, letter to the Massachusetts Militia, October 11, 1798.

  

VI. The Black Robe Regiment’s Relevance Today: A Pattern for Prophetic Courage

The names have changed. The flags are different. The tyrants wear suits instead of crowns, and the tools of oppression are no longer muskets, but mandates, media monopolies, and moral manipulation. Yet the struggle is fundamentally the same: truth against falsehood, liberty against tyranny, conscience against coercion, Christ against Caesar. And in this hour, perhaps more than any other in our modern era, the church must remember the Black Robe Regiment, not as a nostalgic emblem of the past, but as a living pattern for the future.


Modern Tyranny and the Silence of the Pulpit. If the colonial pastors rose to resist a king who taxed without representation, how should we respond when our government suppresses speech, redefines marriage, forces conscience to bow to ideology, and undermines the sanctity of life? What would the Black Robe Regiment say to pastors today who fear losing tax exemptions more than losing truth?

 

Tyranny today is administrative, not monarchical, it comes cloaked in bureaucracy, disguised as public safety, social justice, or tolerance. But the result is the same: laws that silence the faithful, cultural narratives that demonize biblical values, and civil decrees that penalize obedience to God.

 

Too many pulpits have gone dark when they ought to thunder. Too many sermons soothe when they ought to stir. And too many shepherds are more interested in managing reputations than contending for righteousness.

 

As Francis Schaeffer warned in the 1980s, “If there is no final place for civil disobedience, then the government is sovereign, not God.”

 

The church has forgotten that the First Amendment was not written to protect the state from the church, it was written to protect the church from the state.


What Would the Black Robe Regiment Do Today? They would not retreat behind stained glass and privatized spirituality. They would enter the public arena with open Bibles and open mouths. They would preach on life, on truth, on gender, on justice, and on God’s law, not as political talking points, but as moral (absolutes) imperatives rooted in eternal truth.

 

They would remind us that all people are made in God’s image, including the unborn.

They would proclaim that marriage is a divine covenant, not a government construct.

They would teach that liberty is not man’s invention, but God’s intention.

They would call on Christians to engage the culture, not to conquer it politically, but to redeem it prophetically.

They would raise up men and women to run for office, to vote with conviction, to educate their children in righteousness, to resist laws that violate God’s commands, and to stand firm even when the cost is high.

They would call for repentance, not just in the halls of Congress, but in the pews of the church.

They would remind us that the Gospel is not an escape hatch from culture, but a commission to disciple nations (Matthew 28:18–20).


Why This Matters Now. We are a nation adrift. Our schools teach confusion and compliance instead of wisdom. Our courts legislate morality without truth. Our media enthrones sensation over sanctity. Our children are being discipled, not by the church, but by social media and state ideologies. The moral capital of the American experiment is nearly spent.

 

Yet the answer is not in Washington, or Wall Street, or Silicon Valley. The answer lies where it always has, in the church of Jesus Christ, emboldened by truth, grounded in Scripture, unafraid of men, and unwavering in its allegiance to the King of Kings.

 

The Black Robe Regiment is not a relic, it is a model. It is not a movement of the past, it is a mandate for the present.

 

We are not called to rebuild 1776. We are called to be faithful in 2025, in a culture that no longer tolerates conviction, but desperately needs it. As G.K. Chesterton once said, “A dead thing can go with the stream, but only a living thing can go against it.”

 

The church must be that living thing. The sermon must be that living word. And the pastor must be that living voice who stands with Scripture in one hand and courage in the other, proclaiming liberty to the captives and truth to a generation drunk on lies.

 

This is no time for neutrality. This is a time for bold biblical fidelity.

 

VII. The Educational Legacy of the Clergy: Training Minds to Sustain Liberty

If the Black Robe Regiment won the hearts of the people from the pulpit, they formed the minds of the next generation through the schoolhouse and the seminary. To the colonial clergy, education was not an ancillary task, it was essential to the survival of liberty and the flourishing of the Christian faith. A free people must be a virtuous people, and a virtuous people must be an educated people, capable of reading, reasoning, and rightly applying God’s Word in every sphere of life.


The Colonial Church as Schoolhouse. In colonial America, the church and the school were often the same building. The pastor was not only the spiritual shepherd but the chief educator of the community. Teaching children to read was a moral mandate because reading the Bible was seen as essential for both eternal salvation and temporal stewardship.

 

The Massachusetts School Law of 1647, known as the Old Deluder Satan Act, was passed to ensure that every township hired a schoolmaster so that children could learn to read the Scriptures. The preamble reads: “It being one chief project of that old deluder, Satan, to keep men from the knowledge of the Scriptures...”

 

The law mandated literacy for theological and civic reasons. Ministers believed that ignorance was not innocence, it was vulnerability to deception, both spiritual and political.


Founding of the Ivy League: A Pastoral Project. What is often forgotten is that most of America’s early institutions of higher learning, Harvard (1636), Yale (1701), Princeton (1746), Dartmouth (1769), Columbia (1754), were founded to train ministers of the Gospel. The theological core of these universities reflected a vision that Christian doctrine must shape leaders in law, philosophy, medicine, and civil society.

 

Harvard’s original motto was “Veritas Christo et Ecclesiae” Truth for Christ and the Church.

 

Yale’s founders declared that every student should be “fit for public employment both in church and civil state.”

 

Princeton’s most influential president, Rev. John Witherspoon, trained over 300 students who would serve in government, including James Madison, “Father of the Constitution.”

 

These universities were not created to secularize the state, they were built to baptize knowledge in biblical truth. To think Christianly was to govern wisely.


Catechesis and Conscience. Beyond universities, pastors provided catechesis, structured instruction in Christian doctrine, for children and new believers. The Westminster Catechism, Heidelberg Catechism, and New England Primer were widely used. The New England Primer taught not just the alphabet but moral virtue and theology: “A: In Adam’s fall, we sinned all. B: Heaven to find, the Bible mind.”

 

This fusion of literacy, piety, and patriotism created a populace that understood their rights were not given by government but grounded in creation and revealed in Scripture.

 

When the time came for the colonies to stand against British tyranny, they were not led by mobs, but by a people who had been formed by sermons and schooled in righteousness.


Pastors as Public Intellectuals. In modern terms, we might say the Black Robe pastors were public theologians, bridging the gap between church and culture. They did not see intellectual formation as a threat to piety, but a necessary support. They believed that ignorance was a fertile field for tyranny.

 

They preached, they published, and they taught. Sermons were followed by printed treatises, moral essays, and curriculum guides. They instructed young men not just to recite the Creed but to defend it, to apply the Decalogue not only in private virtue but in public policy.

 

Their vision of education was comprehensive: Christ was Lord over logic, mathematics, law, and liberty. As Abraham Kuyper would later write, “There is not a square inch in the whole domain of our human existence over which Christ, who is Sovereign over all, does not cry: Mine!”


Why This Matters Now. Today, our educational institutions, many born from this legacy, have abandoned their theological moorings. Universities once devoted to Christ now promote ideologies that are hostile to His Lordship. Children are catechized by screens rather than saints. And literacy has become functional, not moral, capable of decoding text, but unable to discern truth.

 

If we are to reclaim the vision of the Black Robe Regiment, we must reclaim their educational mission. The church must once again be a center of learning. Christian parents must be reminded that discipleship includes the mind. Christian schools must be built and strengthened. Homeschooling must be celebrated and supported. And pastors must preach not only for conviction, but for understanding, for God is not honored by blind faith, but by informed faith.

 

The battle for liberty is not only fought on the field, it is forged in the classroom.

 

VIII. The Erosion of the Moral Foundation: Liberty Lost by Forgetting God

The Black Robe Regiment preached, fought, and taught to build a nation whose foundation was righteousness, virtue, and liberty under God. But a foundation, no matter how divinely laid, must be maintained, or it will crack, corrode, and collapse. What we face today in America is not the sudden onset of moral decay, it is the long erosion of the very pillars the Black Robe Regiment helped establish.


What the Founders Warned. The men who framed the American Republic knew that liberty could not last without virtue, and virtue could not endure without religion. Again and again, they warned that a free Constitution presupposes a moral citizenry.

 

George Washington declared: “Reason and experience both forbid us to expect that national morality can prevail in exclusion of religious principle.”

 

Benjamin Franklin wrote: “Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom. As nations become corrupt and vicious, they have more need of masters.”

 

Thomas Jefferson, while advocating religious liberty, affirmed: “Can the liberties of a nation be secure when we have removed a conviction that these liberties are the gift of God?”

 

These men disagreed on many points, but they unanimously agreed on this: A republic cannot survive in a state of moral anarchy.


The Long Slide: Silence, Secularism, and Statism. What the Founders feared, we have lived to see. The erosion of America’s moral foundation has not come solely from external enemies, it has come from our own neglect, silence, and compromise.

 

In 1962, prayer was removed from public schools (Engel v. Vitale), not by legislation but by judicial fiat.

 

In 1973, the Roe v. Wade decision legalized abortion nationwide, ending the lives of over 60 million unborn children in the name of “choice.”

 

In 2015, the Supreme Court’s Obergefell v. Hodges ruling redefined marriage, not by moral reasoning, but by raw power.

 

Religious business owners have been fined, sued, and silenced for refusing to participate in actions that violate their deeply held beliefs.

 

Children are now taught that their gender is a matter of personal feeling, not divine design, and schools often hide these transitions from parents.

 

This is not cultural progress. It is moral apostasy. It is not the advance of freedom, it is the descent into bondage, as Isaiah warned:

 

“Woe to those who call evil good, and good evil; who substitute darkness for light and light for darkness.” (Isaiah 5:20)

 

We have traded truth for tolerance, and now we have neither.


The Church’s Complicity. Perhaps most tragically, the church has too often stood by. Afraid of controversy, we have abandoned the prophetic voice for therapeutic relevance. Preachers have grown silent where they once thundered. The very pulpits that once confronted kings now avoid confronting culture.

 

The silence is not neutral. It is surrender. As Dietrich Bonhoeffer said in Nazi Germany:

“Not to speak is to speak. Not to act is to act.”

 

When pastors avoid hard truths for fear of offending the culture, they are not preserving peace, they are permitting decay. When churches trade biblical clarity for cultural acceptance, they may grow in numbers but they shrink in truth. The consequences are visible in every corner of our society.


The Fruits of Forgetting God. We are now living in a Romans 1 culture, a society that has suppressed the truth in unrighteousness and been given over to a debased mind. We have abandoned the fountain of living water and dug for ourselves broken cisterns. The symptoms are everywhere:

 

Rampant fatherlessness and family breakdown

The epidemic of suicide, especially among youth

Increasing hostility to religion in the workplace, public education, and public life

A justice system that punishes the righteous and protects the wicked

A political system that rewards power, not principle

As Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn reflected after the fall of Russia, the reason for his nation’s collapse was simple: “Men have forgotten God.” So it is with us.


Can the Foundations Be Rebuilt? Psalm 11:3 asks: “If the foundations are destroyed, what can the righteous do?” The answer is not despair, but repentance and resolve. We must turn back, not merely to tradition, but to truth. Not to a political platform, but to a biblical worldview. Not to nostalgia, but to reformation.

 

We must do again what the Black Robe Regiment did: preach righteousness, form conscience, resist evil, and disciple nations.

 

The moral foundations can be rebuilt, but only if the church awakens. Only if the pulpit regains its voice. Only if we are willing to pay the price for truth in an age of compromise.

 

We must preach as if souls are at stake, because they are.

We must live as if liberty is at stake, because it is.

We must teach as if the next generation depends on us, because it does.

 

IX. The Rebirth of Christian Citizenship: Discipling a Free People

The legacy of the Black Robe Regiment is not merely one of pulpit power or martial courage, it is one of discipled citizenship. They preached not only to convert the soul, but to form the citizen, equipping believers to live faithfully in the public square. They knew that if Christ is Lord of all, then He must be Lord over how we vote, how we govern, how we educate, and how we engage the culture around us. They taught a generation that Christian faith is not merely personal, it is profoundly public.

 

If we are to honor their legacy and preserve our Republic, we must undergo nothing less than a rebirth of Christian citizenship, a deliberate, theological, and practical reawakening to our responsibilities as stewards of both liberty and truth.


The Great Commission Is Not Apolitical. Many Christians today have been taught that political involvement is unspiritual or even unbiblical. But the Great Commission calls us to disciple nations (Matthew 28:18–20), not just individuals. This includes instructing people how to live under God’s rule in every domain: family, church, education, business, and civil government.

 

Jesus is not only the Savior of souls, He is King of kings and Lord of lords (Revelation 19:16). That means His Lordship extends over legislation, taxation, education, and adjudication. As Abraham Kuyper so rightly declared: “There is not a square inch in the whole domain of our human existence over which Christ, who is Sovereign over all, does not cry: Mine!”

 

The Black Robe Regiment understood this. That is why their sermons so often addressed laws, rulers, and the moral direction of the colonies. They were not preaching politics, they were preaching Christ's authority over politics.


Christian Duty in a Constitutional Republic. In a monarchy, one submits or rebels. In a constitutional republic, one participates. Citizenship is a stewardship. Romans 13 commands us to obey legitimate authority, but in America, the Constitution is the highest civil authority, and “We the People” are the sovereign under God.

 

That means voting is not optional, it is an act of moral obedience.

That means silence in the face of evil is not piety, it is passivity.

That means raising godly children is not merely a private virtue, it is a national necessity.

 

To disengage from the public square is to abdicate our biblical mandate to be salt and light (Matthew 5:13 16). The church must rediscover its role in shaping society, not by coercion, but by conversion, conviction, and courage.


What Christian Citizenship Requires. To live as a Christian citizen today requires more than casual concern. It demands:

 

Biblical literacy; so we may rightly discern good from evil (Hebrews 5:14)

Historical knowledge; so we may understand the ideas and documents that formed our nation

Civic courage; to stand against unjust laws and cultural intimidation

Family discipleship; because the first government God ever ordained was the home

Cultural engagement; not with bitterness, but with truth spoken in love (Ephesians 4:15)

It also means running for office, serving on school boards, writing legislation, forming Christian schools, supporting righteous candidates, and speaking truth in our communities.

Every Christian is called to be a missionary of virtue, a steward of liberty, and a voice for truth.

 

A Vision Worth Dying For, A Life Worth Living For. The men and women of the Black Robe Regiment were willing to risk their reputations, their pulpits, and their lives, not for political gain, but because they believed that God cares about nations. They believed that to stand for righteousness in public life was part of their call to “love God and love neighbor.”

 

Their example calls to us now. Will we rise with the same clarity, courage, and conviction?

We are not called to rebuild a theocracy. We are called to live out the implications of the Lordship of Christ in every realm, including civic life.

We do not need to be angry, but we must not be silent.

We do not need to dominate, but we must not disengage.

We do not need to despair, for the Gospel remains the power of God to transform not only hearts, but cultures (Romans 1:16).

We need a rebirth of Christian citizenship, and it must begin in our homes, our communities, our churches, and our pulpits. 


X. A Call to the Pulpit and the Pew: Reclaiming the Sacred Trust

 

If the legacy of the Black Robe Regiment teaches us anything, it is this: the preservation of liberty is not the task of the politician alone, it is the shared duty of every pulpit and every pew. In their day, as in ours, the fate of the nation hung not on the brilliance of statesmen, but on the boldness of preachers and the faithfulness of the people they shepherded.

 

Today, America faces a moral crisis not because the enemies of truth are strong, but because the defenders of truth have grown silent. The darkness is great not because it is powerful, but because the light has been hidden. The church must once again shine.

 

This is a call to awaken.


To the Pulpit: Preach the Whole Counsel of God. Pastors, the moment is urgent. We need more than messages of self-help and comfort. We need prophetic voices, shaped by Scripture, filled with the Spirit, and unafraid to declare “Thus saith the Lord.” The Black Robe Regiment did not court popularity and bow to adversity. They preached truth, truth that cost them their reputations, their livelihoods, and in some cases, their lives.

 

Preach as if eternity is real, because it is.

Preach as if the moral direction of the nation depends on it, because it does.

Preach with an open Bible and an open heart, calling the people of God to repentance, holiness, courage, and public obedience.

Do not let fear of controversy keep you from your calling. We have enough pundits and performers. What we lack are pastors who will speak the truth in love and refuse to be bought by applause or bullied into silence.

 

Preach Christ, yes, always. But preach the Christ who cleansed the temple, who confronted Herod, who said, “I did not come to bring peace, but a sword.” (Matthew 10:34)

 

Preach the Gospel that transforms not just hearts, but homes, cities, and nations.


To the Pew: Rise Up in Faithful Action. Church members do not wait for someone else to fix what God has called you to engage. You are not a spectator in this spiritual battle. You are the hands and feet of Christ in a culture that has lost its way. You have a calling:


To disciple your children in truth, guarding them from the lies of this present darkness.

To speak with grace and clarity in your workplaces, schools, homes, and neighborhoods.

To support your pastor when he takes a stand, even when it costs.

To run for office, vote with wisdom, and engage locally to protect what is righteous.

To give generously, serve sacrificially, and live as if Jesus is Lord of all, because He is.

 

It was the ordinary men and women sitting in pews who formed militias, stocked supplies, wrote petitions, and risked everything for the cause of liberty. Their courage was ignited by the truth they heard each Sunday. What will we do with the truth we now know?

 

We Must Act Now

This is not a time for nostalgia. It is a time for action.

The unborn still die by the thousands each day.

Children are still being discipled by digital idols.

The family is still under siege.

Our children are under attack.

Religious liberty is still in the crosshairs.

Truth is still called hate.

And the Gospel is still the power of God to save and transform.

 

What we do now, how we preach, how we pray, how we act, will shape the future not only of America, but of the church’s witness in a world desperate for light.

 

Let the preachers preach.

Let the people stand.

Let the church rise.

 

Let the echo of the Black Robe Regiment thunder once more in the pulpits of America and let that thunder be answered with faithful action in every home, every city, and every state.

 

XI. Conclusion: A Republic Worth Preaching For

When the final tally is taken, not of votes, but of faithfulness; not of achievements, but of obedience, what will history say of us? Will it say that we remembered who we were? That we stood in the tradition of those who thundered from the pulpit and marched into battle, not for conquest, but for conscience?

 

Or will it say that we forgot? That we grew comfortable in the shadow of liberty’s dying flame, while the world around us descended into confusion and bondage?

 

The legacy of the Black Robe Regiment calls us to remember, because memory is moral. It is not enough to revere their history; we must revive their courage. They gave us more than words. They gave us a pattern.

 

They did not separate theology from law, Christ from culture, or truth from governance. They knew that to preach Christ faithfully meant proclaiming His Lordship over every inch of life. They taught that liberty is not man’s to give or take, it is God’s to define and defend.

 

They rose when rising would cost them everything.

They stood when the world trembled.

They spoke when silence would have been safer.

And now, their torch has passed to us.

 

We Preach Because the Republic Is Worth It

We preach because the soul of the nation still matters.

We preach because children still deserve truth, not confusion.

We preach because justice must still flow like a river, and righteousness like an ever-flowing stream.

We preach because Christ still reigns, and every knee must bow.

We preach because no republic can long endure whose pulpits are mute.

 

Let every pulpit once again become a pillar of fire.

Let every pew become a place of preparation.

Let every home become an embassy of the Kingdom.

Let every citizen become a steward of liberty.

Let every Christian become a light set on a hill, not hidden, not ashamed.

 

Let the Black Robe Regiment Rise Again

Let them rise, not in robes alone, but clothed in righteousness.

Let them rise, not with muskets, but with truth and tears, and the truth of God

Let them rise, not in anger, but in courage.

Let them rise, not to restore a bygone era, but to reclaim eternal truth in a temporal hour.

 

We have not been called to win history’s applause. We have been called to honor heaven’s commission.

 

We will preach because Christ is worthy.

We will engage because freedom is fragile.

We will act because truth is not optional.

 

The storm is here, but so is the King. And if He is with us, who can stand against us?

 

Let us then be found faithful, on the frontlines of truth, on the walls of our cities, in the pulpits of our churches, in our homes, in our relationships, in the classrooms of our children, and in the halls of our governance.

 

For this, too, is the work of the Gospel. And for this, we preach the truth of our Lord.

 
 
 

Comments


Mesa County, Colorado

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • X
  • TikTok

Paid for by the Commitee to Elect Chaz Evanson for Colorado.


Registered Agent: Charles M. Evanson

Contributions are not tax-deductible.


This communication is not authorized by any candidate or candidate’s committee other than Chaz Evanson for Colorado

bottom of page